All round writing

Are you a specialist, or a generalist? Who do you write for? Do you dabble in too many fields? Wedge worrys.

Logic and wisdom tell me that different writing tasks require different approaches. Corporate Communication often requires an eye for legal detail; Internal Communication needs to consider how the employee constituents will react and respond to news; Marketing and sales copywriting needs a hook and an easy call to action that demolishes a potential customer’s apathy.

Along with writing for the audience, a writer has to consider the medium too. Website, blog, newsletter, leaflet, box, magazine, white paper, mobile website, flyer, poster, book – the message may be of primary import, but the medium flavours how the reader perceives it.

So, how possible is it for a writer to be an expert in all these matters? Am I kidding myself that I can be a writer with who wears multiple hats?

I write web pages, for my voluntary organisation, that are for people in emotional difficulty, but also for the professionals who could help them. I also write emails and communiqués directly to members and supporters, keeping them up to date with our goings on and trying to engage them.

I’m also an Internal Communications specialist, with editorial responsibilities. I’ve stretched these skills into marketing copy as well, with some unmeasured success.

I’ve also written a short novel.

I must be niaive to believe that I have talent in all these areas; I must be ignorant of my own failings, and I’m probably neglecting to analyse where my true skills lie.

I know that different writing tasks require different writing skills and different approaches. But perhaps there’s a reason why recruiters look for specialists; they want to avoid the jack of all trade hacks.

If anyone were to accuse me of being a generalist and a hack, or a weak writer, I don’t think I’d defend myself too heatedly – although I truly believe I’m a skilled communicator for internal audiences (how do you feel about that, my dear external reader?).

My one and only argument is that I write with passion, with integrity, and with my readers in mind. As I have the eye of an editor, I try to watch my sentences and paragraphs as well.

I write for many audiences for the single reason that I have to. I write for many reasons because I have to. I work with some other talented writers, but resources are tight and a lot comes down to me, and whether I can be bothered to write and work. I can be bothered, and so I write.

I ask no one to excuse my lack of skills, but I don’t apologise for working in several fields, with several audiences.

[Wedge]
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

Whatever your job title, people will still treat you like the IT guy

Next Article

Deal with things while they’re small

Related Posts

Would you like a plain sponge, or a rich chocolate cake?

We know that the 'bare bones' of Good Comms must include accurate, relavant, timely and concise details with enough context to help everyone understand the situation - but there's another concept that should play a part, and it's my favourite because I believe it has a real emotional impact on people - richness.
Generations
Read more

Millennials! Generation K is coming! Whatevs, I can’t even.

People are not 'distracted from relationships by their phones' - they are developing relationships through space and time using technology that suits them. Stop telling people to get off their phones when at the same time you expect 100% availability coz 'flexible working in the digital workplace'.