Poor intranet pages will get published

As promised in my previous article, we’re looking at intranet page quality and the four typical standards; perfect, good, good enough and poor.

I focus on quality a lot on this site and in my day job as an intranet manager, but regardless of our standards and goals we have to accept that sub-standard pages will get published on our intranets when we open up publishing access to more people than the Internal Communications team.

Everyone thinks they can write; they cannot. Some people are gracious enough to recognise their lack of experience and take help, support and guidance. Many people think they have a handle on communicating, and will genuinely feel your help and guidance is superfluous to requirements. These people will publish poor pages. On a more open, collaborative, decentralised intranet, such pages will get written and will even get approved by people who should know better.

Yes, you will even find yourself approving poor intranet pages in order to expedite processes and support business needs.

And that’s what we’re talking about; supporting the business. Poor pages will get online because, at times, we all have needs and no time. Look at this article; it’s poor. No image; no bullet list; no sub-headings; a spelling mistake; badly written over-long sentences and a topic that wanders over the page instead of being sharp and concise at the beginning. Yes, this is a poor page on my website, and the are poor pages on my intranet.

Poor pages, while inevitable, should not be left as poor. While it may be impossible to make them good enough at the time, they should be noted and the content owner or editor should return to them at a later point, in line with priorities. Poor pages should make up the smallest percentage of your intranet, and hopefully won’t be high-traffic spots.

We’ll take a look at good enough pages next. Listen to my little 4 minute rant about quality pages!


If you’d like to share or tweet this article, the short URL is: http://kilobox.net/1963

  1. You are absolutely correct. We publish a lot of bad pages because we are understaffed. Unless the corporation is willing to pay for additional resources, I don’t see a way around it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article
Above average

Average intranet pages are OK

Next Article

Choosing between the stakeholder and the audience

Related Posts

When to delete your blog

Wedge is tired of your outdated content. Delete your crappy website / blog ... or use Wedge's handy point system to see if it's worth saving.
Read more

Fear of the big projects

I need to throw-out my current intranet, and yet the risks of the new intranet project failing (in part) are so great I feel overwhelmed. Launch in t-minus three months.
Hiding eyes.
Read more

Accordions on the intranet

Accordion widgets hide ancillary content, lead readers through step-by-step process instructions, force interaction by info-seeking readers, usually fail to print, and can be inaccessible to screenreaders and assistive tech.
%d bloggers like this: